Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Saturday, December 8. 2012Saturday stuff Bring a tissue. First, some really good news from the political front: Washington Post Plans a Paywall That should only eliminate about 90% of this liberal dishrag's readership. Like the NYT, the news will still be open to the public, but to read the op-eds is going to cost a little something, and the only people who'll shell out the bucks are such ardent Lefties that we don't care about them, anyway. But it's a very good thing to keep these creeps away from the average reader. Next, kind of good news/bad news story. First, the good news:
Forced to eat hamburgers and hot dogs? The horror! The bad news is that it's just another urban myth, as Snopes debunks here. It's to note, though, as Snopes does, just how easy it was to believe. Below the fold, two very similar topics. First, one of the most disgusting, foul-mouthed rappers you've ever heard, then a note on Bird Dog's reputation. Or what's left of it. Yes, it's very sad. In his innocence, Bird Dog set the guidelines for all to see:
And what happens? His fellow bloggers inadvertently conspire to have him publicly branded a low-down scumdog LIAR! I hear some guy named 'Doc Murky' was the worst of the bunch. Just ask yourself this: If this site only posted articles on philosophy, psychology, religion, computers, art, music, books, movies, etc, with the occasional story of something wacky going on in Washington, would you call it a 'conservative' blog? Of course not. You'd properly call it an eclectic blog. But what if the vast majority of links and posts actually were political, thereby making a mockery of poor Bird Dog's noble decree? Then you'd certainly call it a 'conservative' blog, right? As it turns out, so would the owner of Right Wing News and PJ Media/Townhall writer John Hawkins:
It should be obvious, but only political sites can be branded 'conservative', not eclectic. So I, personally, beg forgiveness for wantonly — if inadvertently! — contributing to this personal horror he must bear, and I urge my fellow bloggers to think of poor Bird Dog next year and do your damnedest to keep us off this horrible list lest he once again be forced to give up any last shred of dignity, pride and self-respect by having to publicly...
The Twinkle In Matt Drudge's Eye One little mini-meme that's been running around for the past few years is Matt Drudge's sometimes not-so-coy juxtapositioning of headlines. Some of the wags over at PJ Media have highlighted a couple. From yesterday, featuring uber-liberal Barbra Streisand: Leaving his readers wondering which rotting whale he was referring to! Trivia Question WARNING: Strong language follows. All liberals and young children should immediately vacate the viewing area for the next two minutes. A Korean rapper named 'Psy' recently had a YouTube hit with the latest silly form of what these days is euphemistically called "dancing". Here are some (edited) lyrics from one of his songs:
Question: Who recently invited him over for dinner? Answer: The President of the United States of America. Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Good stuff! And shame on all of you for posting so much political dreck that Mag's actually got branded. Looks like it's time for a major rewrite of that banner, eh?
And you're right, that story of the animal activists was very easy to believe. Says something all by itself. I'd call that excellent news regarding the WaPo. Their pre-election bias made me want to vomit.
As for the activists, I bought that whole thing, only thinking that the three missing activists weren't actually "missing", they had simply gone home without checking out. The rest I fervently hoped was true. Funny stuff about poor BD! His series on Bridgeport was quite interesting. It is the season for this again. Because it is funny.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BeR7MtUwVzo I'm new to this site but I love what I see here. This eclectic stuff is a wonderful relief from the normal politics, politics, politics I see everywhere else, even on supposedly 'neutral' sites like the science and tech sites. One of the science sites had a glowing tribute to Bill Clinton a while back. I believe the highest accolade President Bush ever received was "Wanton Destroyer Of Our Delicate Ecosystem".
Is there a 'history' page for the site? If I'm reading the address bar right, this is the 21,149th post?? That's a few! There's no 'history' page, as such, just the medical records here at the sanitarium. I started doing time here about six years ago. Thanks to the caffeine-laced psychotropic drugs, the days just fly by.
And you're correct about the address box. Sobering, huh? And yeah, I mentioned in a post just the other day how offputting the so-called "science" sites are, and the tech sites like C-Net and Wired are BIG on global warming. Of course, what global warming has to do with computer tweaks has yet to be determined. And welcome aboard, sailor. Well, what can we say. There are those that make the surveys and those that create the things surveyed.
Those animal rights activists (idiots) got just what they deserved - would that it had really happened. But it may happen and that makes me smile! In fact - would that it would happen during this "Holiday" season so on-lookers could taunt them by screaming
"Merry Christmas" thousands of times....it warms the heart!! In a time the government or statists tries to intrude in evermore aspects of private lives and expressions, including the traditional arts or religion, then almost everything becomes politicized or subject to a political perspective. Thus, unless blogging endlessly about cats or some such drivel, an eclectic blog will be interpreted as heavily political by some. -- The poll itself was worthless from almost any angle and trying to shift this blog to more kittens is as worthless, misleading, and drivel.
That doesn't seem to be showing much respect toward the owner of this site and his wishes.
Bruce: has anyone ever mentioned you're a classless dickweed? When it comes to the survey, it's "Fuck what the readers want!" When it comes to this post, it's "Fuck what the owner wants!"
What a prick. Of all the multi-blogger sites in the right-wing, this is the only one where one of the bloggers constantly criticizes one of his fellow bloggers in the comments. I've never seen it anywhere else.
I was thinking "asshole" while reading his comment, but "dickweed" is even better.
Merc, you don't show respect toward readers nor toward survey methodology. All you have is the answers that a few hundred (at most) volunteered, not a scientific survey of all readers. Worthless. - Further, take note that during the campaign most of your posts were political, and I'd dare guess, and would count, in higher percentage than my own. --
And, Doc (afraid to let readers know his actual identity), it is you who has tried to badmouth and sabotage a fellow blogger. Doc, you need one, of the mental variety, or one able to treat a snarky maggot. As to BobZ and KJW, back at ya for your intellectual (not), informed (not) verbiage reaction. You must be cultural readers (not). Lastly, John Hawkins self-appointed rating of blogs is his own and his own only, and of no empirical merit. Anyone can make a list of blogs, in any order, and call the list anything. Bruce -
According to your logic, unless 100% of the readers answer the survey, it's completely worthless? We had 400 responses, which is certainly a decent little chunk. "Further, take note that during the campaign most of your posts were political" I confessed to my part in this terrible event in this post, although the majority of ALL my posts during the election period certainly weren't political. "it is you who has tried to badmouth and sabotage a fellow blogger" I tried to...sabotage?...Bird Dog by trying to protect his reputation? Again, you seem to be showing absolutely no regard for his publicly expressed wish that this site be 30% political. Given that you have such little respect for him that you actually blackmailed him once by threatening to quit unless he banned poor Leag, I don't think you have much ground to stand on. Doc, you continue to ignore basic survey methodiology. One does not need 100% to be valid, one needs a representative sample rather than just those who volunteer. Further, the framing of the questions affects the outcome.
As to bad mouthing a fellow blogger, it is you that I was referring to, behind the scenes and within the blo9g's posted rules. In this post's Comments I call you out on this publicly. You are a snarky maggot. As to a balance within the blog of various topics, a count will find that variety of political and non-political among mine, with the exception that when it comes to Israel and anti-Semitism I post more on that than the average Christian or general interest blog. No apologies for that. When it comes to either the defense of the US, for which I fought, or of Israel, for which I fight, I have never been an armchair general or a cynic or wiseguy who doesn't take his responsibilities to action. As to Leag, or Zachass, I and the blog retain the right to ban or delete any Comments. The Comments are not someone else's blog to run rampant in. -- Further, I wonder and can fund out if I cared to whether you troll. Finally, as to Don, are you a Merc parrot or have something constructive to contribute?
#7.2.2.1.1.1
Bruce Kesler
on
2012-12-09 11:06
(Reply)
Doc, you continue to ignore basic survey methodiology. One does not need 100% to be valid, one needs a representative sample rather than just those who volunteer. Further, the framing of the questions affects the outcome.
As to bad mouthing a fellow blogger, it is you that I was referring to, behind the scenes and within the blo9g's posted rules. In this post's Comments I call you out on this publicly. You are a snarky maggot. As to a balance within the blog of various topics, a count will find that variety of political and non-political among mine, with the exception that when it comes to Israel and anti-Semitism I post more on that than the average Christian or general interest blog. No apologies for that. When it comes to either the defense of the US, for which I fought, or of Israel, for which I fight, I have never been an armchair general or a cynic or wiseguy who doesn't take his responsibilities to action. As to Leag, or Zachass, I and the blog retain the right to ban or delete any Comments. The Comments are not someone else's blog to run rampant in. -- Further, I wonder and can fund out if I cared to whether you troll. Finally, as to Don, are you a Merc parrot or have something constructive to contribute?
#7.2.2.1.1.2
Bruce Kesler
on
2012-12-09 11:06
(Reply)
Bruce, if you think Doc was "badmouthing" or "sabatoging" Bird Dog in this post, you need medical help. Or better reading skills.
And he was talking up above about the comments, you dimwit, not the actual posts. Of all the multi-blogger sites out there, you're the one, single asshole who criticizes his fellow bloggers in the comments of their posts. What a schmuck.
#7.2.2.1.2
Don
on
2012-12-09 07:54
(Reply)
Fun post, doc. I like this "lotsa small articles" format. Will you be doing more like it?
My grandmother would call Bruce a "pill". Ginny - Not much more, in the sense that usually the somewhat goofy articles like these get spread out over a week, whereas all of these came up within about a day of each other, so I figured they'd make a fun combo.
Stop ragging on Bruce. Man makes sense to me. Hawkins don't know what he talkin' 'bout. Sheeeeeesh!
"Hawkins don't know what he talkin' 'bout."
Coincidentally, that's exactly what I was thinking about when my email notified me your comment had been left. I was thinking of writing John (I have his ultra-secret email address) and actually linking out every single post I did this election, pointing out how many of them came with videos of the debates and all that, all in an effort to have him raise our standing on the list. #51 is nice, but I thought we should have at least been in the 30's. As you said, Hawkins just don't know what he's talking about. It's amazing how two great minds can think alike! Sadly, I spotted both the story of the animal-rights activists and the story of who Obama is "dining with" as being false and true, respectively.
Animal-rights activist might be idiots; but, even they are not stupid enough to mess with bikers. And Obama is narcissitic enough to attend of show of someone so anti-American and not care what folks think. Gentlemen,
Is it not best to "air the laundry" on the back line not in the front yard? JMHO (and that of my wise ol' Grandpappy) Talk to Bruce. Everyone was having a great time until he showed up.
Don,
The question was more rhetorical, in nature, so consider the "?" mark removed. You're still hanging it in the front yard. |