We are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for.
Earl Warren, then Attorney General of California, recommended to FDR putting Japanese Americans in camps following the sneak attack on Pearl Harbor. FDR approved it.
Both Warren and FDR were Democrats.
Rarely mentioned is the fact that the Canadians also put Japanese in camps (and confiscated their fishing boats).
Jim, Earl Warren was a Republican, in fact he was nominee for Vice President in 1948 on the Dewey-Warren ticket. The Japanese internment was a bipartisan action.
Well, Republicans aren't evil, but the history Whittle is presenting is typically mangled. For instance, he oversimplifies Dr. King's position, who positively advocated for affirmative action. In addition, Whittle distorts why the Democratic Party is so strongly supported by the African American community today. For much of the 20th century, the Democratic Party gathered more and more black support, as they were seen as the party most friendly to the lower and working classes, and as the Democratic Party moved to reject racists policies, with symbolic acts, such as Marian Anderson at the Lincoln Memorial, to integrating the military, even to the point of causing the segregationists to split from the party as Dixiecrats. But when Barry Goldwater repudiated the Civil Rights Act, that spelled the end of any significant black support for the Republican Party.
Zachriel: "For much of the 20th century, the Democratic Party gathered more and more black support, as they were seen as the party most friendly to the lower and working classes..."
Just curious, as blacks today slowly but surely move out of the "lower and working classes" and into the so-called "middle" and "upper" classes, do you think the Democratic Party will begin to lose its 20th century black support?
Also, do you think the Democratic Party's welfare state friendliness to the "lower and working classes" helped or harmed blacks trying to escape the lower classes?
#5.1
Sherman Broder
(Link)
on
2011-12-17 12:19
(Reply)
Zachriel is right. The 1964 Republican convention was a real turning point. Goldwater may have had libertarian motives for his stand, but it alienated the many blacks who up to that point had been lifelong Republicans. Then Nixon came along and consciously went after the Wallace Dixiecrats and the Democrats nominated George McGovern. In less than a decade, the white South had moved almost permanently in to the Republican camp, and blacks became lockstep Democrats.
Sherman Broder: Just curious, as blacks today slowly but surely move out of the "lower and working classes" and into the so-called "middle" and "upper" classes, do you think the Democratic Party will begin to lose its 20th century black support?
Possibly. After all, they support the Democratic Party, which was long allied with the segregationists. There are certainly many conservative blacks, but the Republicans continue to alienate them, such as by claiming their 90% support of Democrats is because they've been bought off.
Sherman Broder: Also, do you think the Democratic Party's welfare state friendliness to the "lower and working classes" helped or harmed blacks trying to escape the lower classes?
Every human action has unintended consequences, but there have been many other social factors that inhibited black progress.