Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Thursday, October 20. 2011Thursday morning linksMrs. BD likes this gardening site Japanese mathematician breaks record for determining the value of pi The Western World: We are better than them Man living as an ‘adult baby’ is cleared of Social Security fraud A Long, Steep Drop for Americans' Standard of Living:
Schools need less emphasis on empathy NYC's economy is equal to that of all of Australia: Which Countries Match the GDP of U.S. Metro Areas? Oops: Energy Department contractors caught altering old press releases involving another troubled green-energy project Desperately Seeking Talent - Employers worry more about the effects of a bad hire than about the problems of hiring someone who is competent but not exceptional. GAO: 42% of temperature gauges in U.S. are wrong Clean Up NY’s Nonprofit Sewer Walter Williams: Pitting us against eachother Biden: ‘All Crime Will Continue to Rise’ if Republicans Don’t Pass WH Jobs Bill Occupy D.C.? Most Back Protests, Surtax Barney Frank supports protesters, raises Wall St. cash Despite frosty relations with the titans of Wall Street, President Obama has still managed to raise far more money this year from the financial and banking sector than Mitt Romney or any other Republican presidential candidate, according to new fundraising data... Wall St. is overwhelmingly Democratic, esp in the upper echelons Washington, D.C. Becomes America’s Richest City - Obama’s $4 trillion army settles into its barracks. The Imperial City, built on our labor Student loans outstanding will exceed $1 trillion this year Hugo Chávez: sick in mind and body The EduJobs III Bailout; Update – Harry Reid: Who cares about private sector jobs? Why Romney Alarms Me President Obama's strategy on jobs is working — even if Americans aren’t Scapegoats: Obama wants The People angry angry angry at the Wall Street bankers and money people Redirection Sol Stern: Who’s a Zionist? The AFL-CIO’s Revolutionary Activist:
Report: Military ballot problems rise Israel’s Impossible Choice
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
My wife is currently re-entering the work force after a 2 1/2 year hiatus. She is interviewing for a position that is relatively entry level, but with some upside potential. The job is designed for people like her, who have spent time on the sidelines.
What's interesting is how much effort they are putting into the hire. She's been on several interviews and is heading for another tomorrow. She has to do a 5 minute Powerpoint presentation on the company and what it has to offer clients. We assume this has nothing to do with the potential upside, trying to figure out if she may be promotable, and believe it has more to do with the fact they can ask potential employees to show them whatever skills they deem necessary. In reality, I'd hope all positions would be filled with such care. During the good times, however, I saw far too many positions filled with friends, family or some other relatively unqualified person. It's not an issue of seeking exceptional people, but rather of competence. When jobs were available and people to fill them fewer or jumping frequently (my industry has an average lifespan of 1 1/2 years per job held), very little effort was put into choosing based on competence. It was a matter of "fill the job". While I was unemployed, I noticed plenty of available jobs. I was held back for 2 reasons. 1. I wasn't interested in the position or didn't think I had the right background. 2. I wasn't prepared to take a salary cut to the degree the open position would require. Assuming I was willing, there was still the fact the employer may deem me "overqualified" for the position. I've hired overqualified people, and I was never disappointed when I did. I find it interesting that individuals with my particular skill set seem to more and more in demand. As a general rule, I am WAY over qualified for most of these quickie jobs that I am offered on a regular basis - I find it...well disturbing I guess.
I'm not sure why that is either although TB's posting the other day about new attorneys leaning on the client's dime seems to be part of the answer. Most companies who need a quick, competent and knowledgeable solution to a problem don't have time to hand it off to a newbie engineer under the guidance of a senior engineer - they need a solution now. So they "outsource" in a sense. What drives that seems to be competition between companies. They just flat out don't have time to properly train new engineers. I've also been told that today's graduate engineer are not trained to the same level as yesterday's engineer. Part of that may be technology too. I'm old enough to have been trained on the use of a slide rule. And old fashioned drawing boards and drawing tools. And adjusting and printing blue prints on the fly during the production process. Today, almost all of that, from calculations to drawing to approval processing, is automated. With 3D printing techniques, they don't even have to build models which is a significant part of the overall learning process. Just a grumpy old engineer sayin' his piece. :>) Can someone please clue me in as to how PowerPoint solves communication problems. I don't get it and the hours that people spend trying to master it could be better placed in simplifying the presentation. ????
Mrs. BD has such very good taste (tee hee). Thank you.
Originally found MF thanks to Mrs. B.D.'s garden sites. Will forever to grateful for her continuing to add her favorites.
re Man living as an ‘adult baby’ is cleared of Social Security fraud.
This strikes me as a fetish, not an "illness', and his benefits should be denied. Since the benefits have been upheld, one wonders how many people will now come out of the woodwork with 'adult baby syndrome"? It looks like it could be an easy scam to execute should one be willing to swallow his pride. re: Desperately Seeking talent. The subtitle has nothing to do with the WSJ article it heads, which is about "The Rare Find." But to answer the question posed by the misleading lede, people worry a lot about hiring the wrong person because these days it is damned hard to fire someone who fails without getting into a big hassle over it, often a big lawsuit which costs more time and money than a lean company can afford.
|
Tracked: Oct 20, 07:26