Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Wednesday, February 9. 2011Academic Negligence Masquerades As Academic Freedom At Brooklyn CollegeJust when I thought it couldn’t get more inane, Brooklyn College is exposed for gross negligence in its hiring and supervision of a self-professed pro-Palestinian activist – a grad student himself -- to teach the Politics of the Middle East to other grad students. As a reporter cites, Kristofer Petersen “makes no secret of his aggressively pro-Palestinian, anti-Zionist views.” The report, titled “Drawing Lessons From The Brooklyn College Uproar,” by quoting those directly involved in the hire, makes it evident from the horses' mouths that this hire is a horse’s ass, irresponsible, ignorant and unprofessional. Although Petersen says of several dozen demonstrators who turned out to support him “he was disappointed that some of his defenders turned their speeches into diatribes against Israel,” Petersen nonetheless addressed them rather than leave. A Commenter to the report lists the virulent hate groups Petersen attracts. Petersen says he modeled his heavily slanted syllabus on that of a professor of Mideast studies at CUNY’s Graduate Center, who recommended Petersen for the position. That professor, however, told the reporter, “the Israeli-Palestinian portion of his former student’s syllabus is different from his own and that Petersen-Overton includes some scholars he would never use in his own class.” He cites Edward Said, “not a Mideast scholar…much more political advocacy than scholarship”; Noam Chomsky, “a linguist, not an expert on the Mideast”; Ilan Pappe “sees himself as an advocate” not an objective historian. That professor says, “many of them should be balanced with others”. But they aren’t. This professor advised Petersen to keep his own views to himself, “but [the reporter sums up] this former student takes the opposite approach.” The recommending professor knew better but didn't act upon it. Although the PoliSci professor who hired Petersen argued that he should be rehired after he was terminated, that professor says the “Israeli-Palestinian conflict [is] a subject with which Ungar isn’t familiar.” So, where was his competence to hire Petersen? Another senior professor at the college says “academic freedom for adjuncts should begin once they distribute their syllabus – but not beforehand. ‘The department has influence, if not control, over the structure of the course, including readings and the topics to be covered.’ “ Instead, the PoliSci department abdicated its responsibility. The report ends with this choice double-talk by Petersen of his slanted course: “Asked whether he sees himself as a scholar or an activist, the professor said he regards himself ‘as a scholar in my scholarly work and as an activist in my activist work. The answer would be both.' ” Petersen, also, has a Brooklyn Bridge to sell. This gross negligence at Brooklyn College is a disgrace. If there’s a lesson to be learned, Brooklyn College must exercise proper vetting and supervision in its classrooms. Anything less would be another Brooklyn Bridge for sale on campus. Academic negligence, and slant, cannot be hidden behind or excused by chanting academic freedom.
Posted by Bruce Kesler
in Hot News & Misc. Short Subjects, Our Essays
at
21:41
| Comments (5)
| Trackbacks (2)
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
As taxpayers, what about writing to the College about hiring someone unqualified to teach at this level: he hasn't finished his PhD and is teaching at the graduate level, as I recall.
This sidesteps the political issues and speaks to matters of qualifications for the college. This is cut-back time for public education. Let's cut back selectively with those schools that don't hire qualified individuals. Mr. Kessler: You need to go to the foundation of the problems you are trying to resolve. The foundation (accrediting agencies) are corrupt. North Central being the worst offender. The schools that are the most corrupt are those claiming to provide students with the skills to improve the world. If you cannot clean up the accrediting agencies you cannot clean up the schools.
One place to start is here: go to your state legislature and demand that a law be passed "requiring" that all degree granting institutions be required to maintain websites. These websites are to post yearly the updated Curriculum Vitae of any person teaching any class. The critical requirement which must be put into law is this: each person teaching a class be required to post the dates they received their degrees (Bachelor's, Master's and Doctoral). This post MUST include the dates received, the name of the school awarding the degree AND the title of the final thesis, as well as the subject area studied and the department doing the awarding. In other words each faculty page should look like something like this: BA (1990-Skookum University) Department of Social Studies. Thesis titled "A study to . . ." MA (2008-Women's Institute) Department of Social Studies "How I overcame being a victim". Ph.D. (2010--Cheap and Easy Institute) Department of Self teaching. "What I did to get a job in academia". By forcing each teacher to post 1. a complete list of degrees,by date and by institution, 2.including the department, or school,college doing the oversight of study and the award of degree 3. The title of final work submitted for the degree, and the focus of study. 4. Professional practice outside of academia to be equally detailed. You will help everyone to see the true qualifications of the teacher. You will also help to see the gaps in education. Mr. Kessler you will meet with very strong resistance to this simple effort to require true transparency. But, this must be done. In this way you would be able to see exactly what other professors are teaching in contra pointe to what Mr. Peterson is teaching--a must if a program/department is to call itself truly rigorous! It would be wonderful if you could get a bill passed that required a mandatory 30 days for fraud. Good Luck, At CUNY, there are detailed CVs for professors, and in the case of this adjunct his detailed CV was available as well. -- The problem is that those with the responsibility for selection and oversight simply didn't do their job, which coupled with an ingrown system at CUNY of using grad students as adjuncts -- almost as a matter of rights for them, and cost savings for CUNY -- allowed this disgraceful appointment and its defense by the college administration. Further, if you look at the college's PoliSci faculty, most specialize in obscure and in "victim" studies, which together with a liberal-left orientation open to pro-Palestinian narratives, did not see the problem even when evident and then denied it.
Would you be satisfied with a curriculum that included one course for each side of the debate? These two courses would be required for each student majoring in Poli Sci.
No. That's debating, usually by propagandists, rather than the open testing and evaluation of facts by reputable scholars.
|
The following post has just gone up at New Criterion's blog, Arma Virumque, one of the most prestigious in the blogosphere. The editor, Roger Kimball, also runs Encounter Books, one of the best sources for serious considerations of issues. I am most
Tracked: Feb 25, 12:27
Tracked: Feb 25, 21:31