Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Wednesday, January 19. 2011Gaza Defender Hired To Teach Middle East At Brooklyn CollegeA Brooklyn College Political Science graduate student enrolled in a Middle East course offered at Brooklyn College for this Spring. The newly hired adjunct professor for the course is Kristofer Petersen. Dismayed after doing some online search on the newly-hired adjunct professor, the student wrote on January 12 to the Department Chair:
Kristofer Petersen’s own description of his background includes: “Outside the academy, I worked for some time as a human rights activist in Gaza and the West Bank and I still maintain close contact with the Palestinian activist community.” The student points out Electronic Intifada as the venue for two of Petersen’s writings and quotes a pro-Palestinian activist and journalist, Ray Hanania, Member of the National Board of the American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, who wrote, “Electronic Intifada, [is] a place where hypocrisy is the norm, factual inaccuracies are common place, and anger and hatred drive their mission….And they are the first to denounce the killing of Palestinians, but never denounce the killing of Israelis.” (NGO Monitor has a Fact Sheet on Electronic Intifada. The Dutch government told an interfaith organization it funds that it may cut off funding if it continues funding Electronic Intifada.) For that matter, the Israel-Palestinian dynamics are a relatively small part of issues in the Middle East. As the WikiLeaks revealed, the principal Arab state preoccupation is threats from Iran. (BBC Middle East editor: “Now their own people can see that in private they are saying the same things about Iran as many Israelis and neo-conservative Americans.”) Petersen is preoccupied with the Palestinian narrative, as evident in his syllabus on the course, Politics of the Middle East: “the course is structured around the broad theme of identity and will be conducted at two levels: (1) a macro level which focuses on the Arab Middle East in general—and does not include details about Iran, Turkey, Afghanistan or Pakistan—and (2) a micro level which focuses specifically on Israel/Palestine.” There are two required readings in Petersen’s course syllabus.. The first is The Many Faces of Political Islam: Religion and Politics in the Muslim World by Mohammed Ayoob, who concludes writing:
Ayoob footnotes John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt and Rashid Khalidi, strident critics of Israel. The second required reading Palestine and the Arab-Israeli Conflict: A History with Documents by Charles Smith, is either lauded as a resource or pointedly critiqued -- for example, “The closing chapters of the book are undoubtedly biased towards the Palestinian account.” Recommended readings for Petersen’s Middle East course are mostly of similar tilt. As the student wrote to the Department Chair:
The student’s letter concludes:
It should be of interest what the vetting procedure is at Brooklyn College to select a pool of well-qualified candidates, the criteria by which Kristofer Petersen was selected to teach the Middle East, and how Petersen compared to other qualified candidates. Academic transparency should not be -- nor viewed -- as a challenge to academic freedom but rather as its necessary bulwark of credibility. The department Chair did reply to the student, but requested that I not quote his email. He recognizes the student’s reservations but expects the course itself should be fair and balanced. An indication of Mr. Petersen’s more supposedly serious work is the chapter Petersen recently co-wrote, Retooling Peace Philosophy: A Critical Look at Israel's Separation Strategy in the book Peace Philosophy in Action. It is a polemic masquerading as scholarship. Petersen’s co-authors, Johannes Schmidt and Jacques Hirsh, are Danish academics. Hirsh is avidly anti-Zionist, writing in the Marxist periodical Monthly Review: “As the focus on the Holocaust evolved, it came to be seen as related to the transformation of the struggle for a secure Israel into one of an expanding and conquering state.” Schmidt is active in the international “peace” movement. Petersen’s chapter presents Israel’s Zionism as a “philosophy of separation” and “ethnic separation” creating an apartheid state and so treating Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. “This chapter argues that the philosophy of separation is a logical extension of Zionism’s exclusionary ideological history and that its implementation in the Gaza Strip has not reduced the level of violence against Israeli civilians.” The chapter goes on this “has led some to draw comparisons with South African apartheid, a parallel that has become increasingly justified…” Now, many within Israel forecast and most now see that Israel’s unilateral withdrawal from occupation of Gaza would allow the most violent among Gazans to take control, as Hamas did, and imperil Israel, as homemade rockets and the Iranian arming of Hamas has done. But, Petersen’s chapter treats the cause of Gazan violence against Israel as if it is Israel’s fault, somehow a consequence of ensuing Gazan poverty: “…Israel’s general security situation has actually worsened, roughly commensurate with the plummeting humanitarian conditions in Gaza.” There’s no exploration of the murders by Hamas of its Palestinian political foes, its authoritarian control of Gazan society, pocketing or use on arms of hundreds of millions of dollars a year of international humanitarian aid from the West, other Arab states avoidance of support for Hamas, or Hamas dedication from its inception to eradicate Israel. Even a former Board member of J Street, whose start-up funding came from George Soros and is widely criticized for its weak stance toward Palestinian and Iranian extremism, now the State Department’s Anti-Semitism Envoy, recently observed, "I think when you hold Israel to a different standard, it is over the line." Sources approvingly cited for the views expressed in Petersen’s chapter tell us much: Noam Chomsky (also in personal conversations with the author concluding the chapter); Norman Finklestein; Walt & Mearsheimer. Other sources are selected, often selectively, to buttress this shabby diatribe. Is this the quality of scholarship or thought appropriate to teaching a course on the Middle East? The graduate student agrees that the class itself will tell whether Mr. Petersen will be fair and balanced, and looks forward to it being worthwhile and a credible scholarly course. PETERSEN ONLINE WRITINGS APPENDED TO THE STUDENT’S LETTER: “Examples of what I have come across online from Mr. Petersen’s own work: • Associated in administrative capacity with the website http://harmonicminor.com/ that posts chilling articles vilifying Israel. As written on another website, 2 “Kris Petersen is a graduate student currently (2007) conducting research in the Gaza Strip. He runs a news/commentary blog at www.harmonicminor.com.” Some sample article headlines 3 on Mr. Petersen’s harmonicaminor.com blog include: 1. “Apartheid Regimes Heart Apartheid Regimes: Secret South African documents reveal that Israel offered to sell nuclear warheads to the apartheid regime, providing the first official documentary evidence of the state’s possession of nuclear weapons…” 2. “Couldn’t Have Said It Better: Let’s start with the most obvious. This is a cynical ploy by the Israeli government to divert attention from the findings of the UN report…” 3. “Moral Narcissism: Such a remarkable story could only happen in the midst of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. A young gay Palestinian man, who is in grave, life-threatening danger and cannot return to his home with his Israeli partner, was saved by a stranger who came to his aid – a religious West Bank settler. (full article…) Look at this morally narcissistic story. Does the Israeli media also report that their noble military uses sexual identity as blackmail against Palestinians they hope to use as collaborators? Do they report that Palestinian/Israeli couples (of any sexual orientation) are barred from residence in that racist state [Israel]?” 4. “‘Academic Freedom’ in Israel: Israeli academics are being watched. Vigilantes check what they say or write – and, if they are judged ‘anti-Israel,’ incite donors to the universities and colleges where they teach to act against them. Students are encouraged to spy on their teachers and to report what they say. Academics on the left are the targets. They are vilified as ‘Israel’s academic fifth column’ and ‘our inner scourge.’ They are called ‘traitors’ and are accused of ‘treasonous betrayal’ and of wanting ‘to suck up to and be accepted by the enemy.’” A sample comment post on his own blog reads 4 : Kris Petersen (author) said: Given that the U.S. provides Israel with complete diplomatic support in the U.N. by vetoing any discussion or serious actions against the occupation, the change must come from the U.S. It alone has the power to pressure Israel into ceasing settlement expansion and withdrawing (to any borders). When the U.S. believes that peace in the Middle-East is in its interest, the occupation with end and the work towards reconciliation can really begin. # 27 April 2008 at 10:01 • Strong personal identification with Palestinian activism, describing himself 5 : “Outside the academy, I worked for some time as a human rights activist in Gaza and the West Bank and I still maintain close contact with the Palestinian activist community.” • Mr. Petersen is author of “Waiting to Enter Gaza” published March 2009 on ElectronicIntifada.net 6 , Canadian Islamic Congress website 7, and Palestinian World Blogspot 8 (amongst others). Article excerpts: “If there is a single act that characterizes the plight of the Palestinian people under Israeli occupation, it is waiting: waiting in lines to pass through the hundreds of checkpoints scattered across the West Bank, waiting for Israel to issue an identification card, waiting for permission to travel to the next village or out of the country, waiting for loved ones languishing in Israeli prisons to be released -- waiting for peace, waiting for justice …. “My heart aches for Gaza: for the fresh sea air and the desert breeze, for the sweet smell of orange groves and the bitterness of unripe pomelo, for the hospitality offered by those who have lost everything but their lives, for my friends suffering indescribable horrors and for the indomitable spirit of a people who refuse to be extinguished in spite of it all. As I catch my flight out of the region, I am acutely conscious of the fact that Israel has scored a minor success by preventing me from entering Gaza. I could not wait there indefinitely. But I know that there are many other ways to fight Israeli oppression. And through it all, Gaza will endure.” • Author of “The Gaza Strip: Disengagement Two Years On” published on Electronic Intifada 9 that beats Israel for withdrawing from Gaza and claims, “However, Israeli control in Gaza two years after disengagement is total; indeed, the very text of the disengagement plan explicitly provides for much of the current strangulation…” • Author of a research paper Counting Heads: Israel’s Demographic Imperative 10 claiming Israel is essentially engaging in ethnic cleansing, as stated: “The implementation of policies including the endorsement of ‘transfer’—a euphemism for the expulsion of Palestinians in 1948, the razing of Palestinian villages, discriminatory legislation and the creation of facts on the ground—are a logical extension of the Zionist ideology. The construction of the West Bank Barrier (WBB) is the current manifestation of Israeli demographic fears and the Zionist desire to further curb non-Jewish elements.” • Author of a research paper Inventing the Martyr: Martyrdom as Palestinian National Signafier 11 that attempts to normalize and excuse Palestinian suicide bombings/martyrdom. • Demonstrated personal support for Palestine and Palestinians only, for example: Mr. Petersen wrote the boxed comment below on a blog called “Noticeable Changes: flow like summersaults: the liberation of palestine” 12 which features the running quote, “Remember the solidarity shown to Palestine here and everywhere... and remember also that there is a cause to which many people have committed themselves, difficulties and terrible obstacles notwithstanding. Why? Because it is a just cause, a noble ideal, a moral quest for equality and human rights." --Edward W. Said (1935-2003)” Hi, I discovered your blog on DesertPeace’s blogroll… Nice design and great content! You may be interested in my own site: http://www.harmonicminor.com – I am an American graduate student currently conducting research in the Gaza Strip. I have been posting excerpts from interviews and other material relevant to Gaza… Today, for example, I posted an interview with noted academic and journalist, Jennifer Loewenstein. I will link to you – perhaps you can do the same if you like my site! Keep up the good work! -Kris By: Kris Petersen on October 26, 2007 at 6:27 am Reply 2http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ed6Bwc19zMwJ:cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/authors.php%3Fauid%3D21165+http://harmonicminor.com/+kristopher+petersen&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us 3 http://www.blogcatalog.com/blogs/harmonicminorcom 4http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:5Yw1jj1e0D8J:harmonicminor.com/2008/04/14/asad-abu-khalil-the-anniversary-of-the-lebanese-civil-war-the-wars-that-never-end/+http://harmonicminor.com/+kristopher+petersen&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us 5 http://gc-cuny.academia.edu/kpetersenoverton 6 http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article10421.shtml 7 http://www.canadianislamiccongress.com/fb/friday_bulletin.php?fbdate=2009-04-03 8 http://palestinianworld.blogspot.com/2009_03_01_archive.html 9 http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article9118.shtml 10 http://www.ijis.aau.dk/articles/vol5_no1/2_Kris_PDF.pdf 11 http://gc-cuny.academia.edu/kpetersenoverton/Papers/253796/Inventing_the_Martyr_Martyrdom_as_Palestinian_National_Signifier 12 http://noticeable.wordpress.com/general-comments-and-feedback-2/ PETERSEN’S FULL COURSE SYLLABUS HERE: http://www.petersen-overton.com//courses.html
Posted by Bruce Kesler
in Hot News & Misc. Short Subjects, Our Essays
at
11:15
| Comments (15)
| Trackbacks (7)
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
I happen to be on the side of Israel, generally. I am somewhat sympathetic to the problems all sides face. I am totally opposed to Hamas and other terrorist organizations who use violence to further their agenda. I am not ready to deny anyone a job simply because he chooses the other side in a political issue. If this man provides actual support for terrorism or participates in it then I say charge him but otherwise I'm not sure what he has done makes him unacceptable as a professor.
Petersen has full right to his views. As the post relates, his published views are quite partisan and one-sided. The big question is whether his course will also be. His syllabus is not reassuring. Students have the right to fair and balanced scholarship. We'll see if they get that in the course.
"Students have the right to fair and balanced scholarship."
I snorted my tea out of my nose when I read that. To paint this with a rather broad brush, students within the educational system are indoctrinated in the socially approved narrative. Be it sexual orientation, environmental studies, or Middle East History, they will receive the point of view in favor with the intelligentsia of the time. This is not new, or a surprise, it's been going on, most especially at the "Ivory Tower" level, for a long time. http://www.studentsforacademicfreedom.org/news/2735/nazis-in-the-ivory-tower Sounds like a student who is going to have a very hard year, as his point of view will not be welcome within that class, nor will his papers and work receive the grade appropriate to their level of level of effort and understanding. I know Mr. Peterson from a personal capacity. In my view, Mr. Peterson is not pro-Palestinian, but rather pro-human rights. I know you might not agree with me, but as you will learn, Mr. Peterson is very capable and even embraces academic debates that give space for all sides of contentious issues relating to the Middle East. While he does work with the Palestinian civil society (for example the Palestinian Center for Human Rights that received funds from the Ford Foundation and various EU governments), Mr. Peterson is fond of engaging commentators with radically different views. Mr. Peterson likes lecturers with strong opinions on issues of war and peace, but he does not like the use of lectures to communicate singular points of views instead of having critical discussions incorporating diverse perspectives.
Thanks for writing, Jonas. Whether Mr. Petersen's working for the Palestinian Center For Human Rights in Gaza, the Center harshly critical of Israel, or in Mr. Petersen's writings, he is clearly one-sided and partisan. Hopefully, Mr. Petersen will behave differently in the classroom.
The department Chair ... recognizes the student’s reservations but expects the course itself should be fair and balanced.
On what basis does he have this expectation? I'd like to sell a bridge in Brooklyn to GoneWithTheWind if he or she thinks that this ACTIVIST with a view that is rabidly partisan (and inaccurate; the entire apartheid narrative is utter crap. I just was in Israel in Dec. We were in malls in Jerusalem, and in those malls were plenty of Muslims, doing what WE were doing, without hassle: SHOPPING! And eating in the food court next to us. Where was the ethnic cleansing? Oh wait, that was in Gaza, but it was making Gazaa Judenrein when the Jews were thrown out by...Jews. And Abbas has stated Jews will not be able to live in the West Bank "Palestine")...if GWTW really believes this 'teacher' will be fair to anyone who opposes his sick and misinformed views.
It would be wonderful to believe the teacher will be fair, but we know, as others commented, that all over the country, kids are being exposed to utterly useless, at best, narratives, or at worst, outright lies and historical fictions that make the West, the U.S. and Israel all look evil. Socialism is actively promoted, and capitalism is actively denigrated. I would be willing to bet, quite a lot, that Mr. Petersen will be an abhorrent teacher, an unfair and tilted one who will not tolerate dissent in his class, not on this subject. The syllabus already tells the story, and I am sure as I could be that it will only be worse in the lecture hall, as he pounds out his view of Israel as the Little Satan, and those poor, peacable Gazans (the ones who tore down the greenhouses the Israeli 'settlers' left, the ones who machine gun their political opponents in the streets after kangaroo trials...who throw their opponents off of tall buildings...and yes, attempt to murder Israeli civilians with rockets for no other reason other than sheer hatred) who are so helpless and hopeless because of those horrible Israelis. Feh. Another example of the rapid decline of Western Civ and the Academy. Perhaps the solution is to have a lot of well-informed people enter his class, argue with him, and if he lower grades on the basis of students disagreeing with him, to commit lawfare on the Prof and sue him and/or the college for unfair treatment.
Make his time at Brooklyn College as uncomfortable as possible. It would not be proper for outsiders to do that, or students to enroll just to disrupt his class.
Some blog posts make it very apparent that the strategy of some who think their views are "pro-Israel" is silencing academic and media commentators with dissenting views. You should know that the Israeli media and academic debaters, with whom Mr. Peterson would not agree, are more encouraging of free debates than some who claim to be "pro-Israeli" in the US media and academe.
Jonas: Thanks, again. I would add that the Middle East country in which Arabs enjoy the most civil liberties and in which there the freest debate is Israel.
Mr. Kesler, you elide the point that Mr. Ecke makes here. He indicated that those who consider themselves to be pro-Israel in America try to prevent others from voicing their views rather than engaging in debate, and pointed out that the discussion in Israel itself is more tolerant of diverging opinion than the debate here.
You replied not by addressing his argument but instead by claiming that debate in Israel is more robust than debate in neighboring countries. This is a classic "i don't want to engage with your perspective, so HEY, LOOK OVER THERE AT THIS DISTRACTION!!!" technique, but I won't be gulled. Why is it that, given the overwhelming pro-Israel views on evidence in the mainstream US media and in Congress, people are so threatened by pro-Palestinians as to try and prevent them from working in academia? After all, it's not as if you're poking around trying to make sure that all teaching on the Israel/Palestine matter is objective. You just want it to agree with your perspective. How is that "the quality of scholarship or thought appropriate to teaching a course on the Middle East?" And why were you unwilling to actually engage with Mr. Ecke's question?
#3.1.2.1.1
Joseph
on
2011-01-28 10:24
(Reply)
Brooklynite and graduate student here, though not an attendee of brooklyn college. I missed this brouhaha when it first happened but heard about the course being canceled and found your post. I should note that I have no personal interest in this matter, not being of either nationality under discussion nor attending the school in question. However, as a lifelong NY state resident and having been in NYC for a decade, the CUNY system is a matter that concerns me.
I find your position to be unpersuasive. You claim that this would-be professor is unacceptably biased for the position he would like to hold. This claim becomes more suspect as one reads your post - it is clear that you disagree comprehensively with his position, and so your attempts to paint him as some sort of wild-eyed activist have the effect of making your own implacable position on the subject apparent. The pieces of evidence you use to buttress your case are also indicative of your own biases: -you mention KP's citation of Chomsky as if that were something to be ashamed of. -you mention of KP's co-authors that one wrote for a Marxist publication and the other "is active in the international “peace” movement" as if these were grounds for dismissing their perspectives. - you write "But, Petersen’s chapter treats the cause of Gazan violence against Israel as if it is Israel’s fault, somehow a consequence of ensuing Gazan poverty" with the clear implication being that you think no blame attaches to one of the parties in this dispute. - you quote KP's discussion of academic freedom in Israel as evidence of his bias, but it turns out that when he wrote "if they are judged ‘anti-Israel,’ incite donors to the universities and colleges where they teach to act against them." it turned out to be true, but about America and him in particular, as you managed to incite those very groups and got his class canceled. The bottom line is that rather than the voice of reason trying to avoid a partisan professor inculcating students you tried to portray yourself as, it is clear your are merely one partisan trying to limit the influence of another partisan whose position is opposed to yours. The fact that you have succeeded bodes poorly for Brooklyn College. Thanks for writing, and making my point, Joseph. A one-sided partisan should not be teaching this course.
Dear Bruce,
Respectfully: although I appreciate the passion with which you advocate your views in this blog, it failed to convince me of this person's unsuitability to teach a course. Even if I remain unconvinced, I support your right to have an opinion. But I also believe in Peterson-Overton's right to have an opinion as well. Finally, I note that you keep avoiding the questions you are asked. |
Tracked: Jan 21, 14:36
I wrote on January 19 about the appointment at Brooklyn College, my alma mater, of a pro-Palestinian activist – just 1 ½ years into his own PhD studies -- to teach a graduate course on the Middle East. After that the New York State Assemblyman of
Tracked: Jan 27, 01:30
Tracked: Jan 28, 09:30
Tracked: Jan 28, 09:30
Tracked: Jan 28, 11:48
Tracked: Jan 28, 13:35
Those of you spending tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars for your children’s college education, and paying taxes to support colleges, may be interested in a current brouhaha at my alma mater, Brooklyn College. A doctoral student, 1 ½ years
Tracked: Jan 28, 14:39
Tracked: Jan 28, 16:31
Tracked: Jan 28, 17:29
Tracked: Jan 29, 04:03
Tracked: Jan 29, 09:35
Tracked: Jan 30, 10:02
Tracked: Jan 30, 10:02
Brooklyn College President Karen Gould today announced the re-hire of Kristofer Petersen. His appointment to teach a graduate course on the Politics of the Middle East had been rescinded last week, after a furor over his avid pro-Gaza writings, activ
Tracked: Feb 01, 01:01
The following post has just gone up at New Criterion's blog, Arma Virumque, one of the most prestigious in the blogosphere. The editor, Roger Kimball, also runs Encounter Books, one of the best sources for serious considerations of issues. I am most
Tracked: Feb 25, 12:27
Tracked: Feb 25, 21:31
Tracked: Mar 02, 14:02
Tracked: May 11, 02:24
Tracked: Nov 29, 11:40