Shredding the “climate consensus” myth

Quicksearch

Blog Administration

RSS Readers

Thursday, December 9. 2010

Shredding the “climate consensus” myth

Watts: More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims – Challenge UN IPCC & Gore. One sample - from a member of the IPCC:

We’re not scientifically there yet. Despite what you may have heard in the media, there is nothing like a consensus of scientific opinion that this is a problem. Because there is natural variability in the weather, you cannot statistically know for another 150 years.” — UN IPCC’s Tom Tripp, a member of the UN IPCC since 2004 and listed as one of the lead authors and serves as the Director of Technical Services & Development for U.S. Magnesium.

Let's have a worldwide debate. I think it's all about money and power and politics, and that science has little to do with it. The Wikileaks confirm that. Over my years here at the Farm, I have become convinced that 99% of "crises" are trumped up. Always ask "Cui bono?"

That I believe that some warming would be great for the planet and for mankind has nothing to do with it. It's too cold in NYC today, and I don't have 150 years to wait and see.

Posted by The News Junkie in Hot News & Misc. Short Subjects at 12:00 | Comments (5) | Trackbacks (0)

Trackbacks

Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

--i was just cleaning out old files, making room on disc and so forth, and i styopped and re-read this one, Carter being in the news again lately.

http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=21736

here's a snip:

Using the Russians to influence the presidential election was nothing new for Carter.

Schweizer reveals Russian documents that show that in the waning days of the 1980 campaign, the Carter White House dispatched businessman Armand Hammer to the Soviet Embassy.

Hammer was a longtime Soviet-phile, and he explained to the Soviet ambassador that Carter was "clearly alarmed" at the prospect of losing to Reagan.

Hammer pleaded with the Russians for help. He asked if the Kremlin could expand Jewish emigration to bolster Carter's standing in the polls.

'Carter Won't Forget That Service'

"Carter won't forget that service if he is elected," Hammer told Dobrynin.[\i]

--only mention it now because of NJ's [i]"I have become convinced that 99% of "crises" are trumped up. Always ask "Cui bono?"

...so i'm thinking, does anybody give a damn anymore that Armand Hammer (Occidental Petroleum)was deeply involved in Carter's Love Canal crisis --the crisis that gave us the environmental superfund that has paid green Dem-connected organizations some 500 billion so far, in 70s dollars? That the spearpoint in that elaborate scheme --wholly driven by NYC media --was a young Carol Browner, now Obama's energy, or whatever, Czarina?

Can you say "BP"?

#1 buddy larsen on 2010-12-09 15:06 (Reply)

As usual, i can't make Maggie's HTML tags work --the above was supposed to quit the italics after the name 'Dobrynin' and go to normal text to set up the quote from NJ. Nitpick, but the picture of the text is all wrong now, so i hadda yadda yadda blah blah

#2 buddy larsen on 2010-12-09 15:10 (Reply)

They drive me nuts too.

#2.1 Bird Dog on 2010-12-09 16:14 (Reply)

well THAT's comforting --if practice won't make perfect, it must not be me --that Dr. Merc and that "elementary my dear watson" attitude of his --tsk tsk

#2.1.1 buddy larsen on 2010-12-09 16:35 (Reply)

We seem to have been bouncing from one crisis to another, ever since 9/11. Anyone who believes the financial meltdown was just another accident of capitalism, just hasn't been paying anywhere near enough attention. Crisis, after crisis, after crisis --and Constitution-destroying solution after solution after solution. None of which have worked, but "it coulda been worse!"

Yeah. Right. It could've been worse. it could also have been better --MUCH better: no crisis at all to begin with! It is all deliberate, my friends --all deliberate. I say this not off the top of my head, but after a more intense year of reading than looking back i can even believe i've done.

The latest crisis is Wikileaks, of course --and what it's aimed at is the internet, and the three people AFSCME just declared a boycott against: Rush Limbaugh, John Stossel, and Glenn Beck. Judge Napolitano won't be far behind --just watch.

AFSCME: Association of Federal, State, County, and Municipal Employees.

Wants YOU to boycott communications people, and their sponsors in private industry.

#3 buddy larsen spam on 2010-12-09 18:00 (Reply)

Add Comment

Name
Email	(Your e-mail will not show in your comment)
Homepage
In reply to
Comment	By commenting on this site you agree to the site rules listed here. Email addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for email notifications. Quick reference guide: [i] italics [/i], [b] bold [/b], [u] underline [/u], [url] (web address) [/url]. More tips here. Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (word), underscore are made via _word_. E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications. To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly. Enter the string from the spam-prevention image above: BBCode format allowed
	Remember Information? Subscribe to this entry

Maggie's Farm

Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page

Categories

Quicksearch

Links

Blog Administration

RSS Readers

Thursday, December 9. 2010

Shredding the “climate consensus” myth