Maggie's Farm

My daughter is so beautiful sometimes I find myself mesmerized just looking at her. She and I were walking across a mall street when a carload of Mexicans and blacks stopped and muttered stuff at her with lascivious looks of lust. She didn't notice, but I turned and it's the closest I've ever come to becoming a heat-seeking missile.

As far as the girl in Polanski's case, I read her grand jury testimony last night. I ended up with zero sympathy for her. The grand jury wants every single detail, and she gave them including how she explained to Polanski that taking a quaalude would not make him unable to drive. She took less than half a pill on her own volition just as she drank the champagne. She explained to the jury that she had had sex before Polanski 'two' times (I bet), and that she had been drunk before several times. She had also willingly gone out three times with Polanski and taken her clothes off, on her own, each time. Polanski never once forced her to do any of those things. He suggested it for the photographs and she complied. They were also not befuddled or drunk at the time they had sex, and she, again, willingly walked into the bedroom where the sex occurred. She did not run screaming out of the house, she, in fact, called her mother to tell her she would be late. She chose not to wear a bra on any of the outings she went on with Polanski and willingly posed on three separate occasions without her shirt. Polanski never photographed without her underwear on. During the sex, Polanski asked her if she were on birth control and she said no, so he asked if he could 'go from the back'. She did not fight him, nor did she scream and yell when a female, older woman resident of the house knocked on the door of the bedroom they were in.

The subtleties of her posings cannot be garnered from words on paper, but it is apparent that she wanted a career as an actress or model, as she put it, and was more than willing to use Polanski to get there. As well, her mother was aware of every outing with Polanski and let her go unaccompanied.

All three, Polanski, the girl, and her mother are scum. That may be why he was able to plea for 'sex with a minor' instead of rape.

As for Polanski's comment that had he murdered someone, there would have been less objection.... and why as he goes on to say - the judge, the lawyers, all men think about f..king young girls. Ever read about the travel to Thailand for very young girls or that the number one sites on porn are older men having sex with young girls? Ever see that 'young' girl that Maggie's Farm posts often because she gets the most salacious and prurient comments of all the half-naked beauties they post. The 'young' girl is made to look like a student and the comments soar.

Look homeward, you angels of justice, and things are far from what they seem. The 'victim' in this case received a large settlement, and she is begging authorities not to reopen the case. If you read her testimony, you know why. She does not want the world to know she was a slut, a druggie, and a boozer before she even met Polanski.
`

I didn't rationalize a thing. I gave the facts from the grand jury testimony.

I suggest you reconcile those before you enter the court room and pass judgement. Ask yourself while you're at it if it was rape. It could just have easily been a set-up.

I don't generalize, Sean. I did not say "..all men are dogs.." I just gave you facts. Don't accuse me of playing with the law. I didn't go there. I just gave you the salient facts of her testimony. The law in fact did accept the lesser charge no doubt having read her testimony. Why don't you go read it before you jump down a woman's throat who took the trouble to do some research before she sounded off.
`

What matters is discernment. Have you read about or seen the show about the organization that works to free men who are in prison for crimes they did not commit? Most were put there by judges who lacked discernment and dismissed these men with a wave of his hand when some woman cried 'foul' or 'rape'. This organization can't keep up with the demands for justice, but they work tirelessly to help these men and have had remarkable success via new technology in freeing many of them.

The sad part of the show is when you witness the guy walking out of prison after twenty years.... they don't have grudges or feelings of revenge. The state gives them bus fare and a hundred bucks and a bon voyage. One man was in jail after paying child support for fifteen years only to find out the child wasn't his. He stopped paying and they put him in jail. He wasn't married to the 'mother' but agreed to pay believing her when she said the child was his.

The rule of law is a good thing, but it requires discernment and truth in order to function. Part of that discernment is for the judge to recognize that the female species is far more mercurial than the male.

Funny how we adopted much of our governance and law from the Greeks and Romans. Every nobleman had a young boy to pleasure him. Mothers groomed their sons to be picked by a noble man knowing their sons would be educated and perhaps attain a higher station in life.

Whatever...... Put that student/slut picture back up so the guys can drool and make untoward comments - forgetting all the while that the young girl willingly posed for that shot for the purpose it exacts.
`

You're on a tilt-a-whirl of passion, here, Luther. My commentary is not empassioned, it's based on fact. Go to SmokingGun.com and read for yourself.

What I've done here is taken several men out of their comfort zones by making them see another viewpoint that gags their sensibilities. I don't make knee-jerk statements and I'm rationalizing pedophilia? Give me a break. People have horse blinders on at times, and when they're yanked off by the suggestion and truth that a 13 year old female was naughty, they kill the suggestor.

Hey. Since when has The Farm started editing comments as opposed to simply deleting those they find offensive? That's pure crap.

What was it? "negro"? "parade"? "metaphor alert"?

or did I say "Oh my god" at the end? I can't remember.

SHEESH. Let's not soil our sensibilities now.
`

Spell it out, RL. Are you suggesting I was a whore at 13?
`

I make it habit not to get pushed around.

But you made no clear spoken statement that I can see. Want to rephrase it for me so I don't end up muttering small talk at the wall?
`

Looks as if I'm keeping a Farmer up monitoring comments so he/she can delete them or edit them. Go to bed. I've got a book to read.

I'll be back, though. I'll be on this Titanic when it finally sinks. It's already hit the iceberg.

`

Why don't you all do some research and THINK?

TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 2009

Victim: Courts Did More Harm Than Polanski

Samantha Geimer, the 13-year-old sexually molested by director Roman Polanski, is 45 today and wishes the whole matter would go away. "Every time this case is brought to the attention of the court, great focus is made of me, my family, my mother and others," Geimer wrote in her affidavit to a January court filing seeking the dismissal of the charges. "That attention is not pleasant to experience."

MORE
One potential factor in her attitude: Geimer sued Polanski many years ago and an out-of-court settlement was reached.



"It is not about Polanski being a scumbag, he is. It is about the US legal system being about itself and not about society or the parties involved.

If you go to thesmokinggun.com you can read the letter to the court from the lawyers of the girl's parents stating that they did not want a trial, did not want Polansky to serve jail, wanted Polansky to attend rehab and wanted to Polanksy to admit his guilt. Polansky then plead guilty and went into a rehab/observation clinic. The judge and prosecutor had agreed to let Polansky off with time served. You only plead guilty when there is a deal set up and agreed upon.

However Polansky's lawyers received word that the judge was going back on is word and was going to throw Polansky in jail. That is why he bolted. The judge was probably bowing to political pressure.

The crime is with the LA judicial system not Polansky.

#1 | POSTED BY F---- AT 2009-09-29 03:27 PM

(I shortened the commenter's name.)
`

Geoff,

Polanski plead guilty. That is not the problem. At the urgence of the girl's family, he agreed to a plea bargain and the judge sent him off to rehab - whatever that means. While he was in rehab, Polanski asked the judge (petitioned the court) if he could go to France to finish working on a movie. The judge said okay and off to France went Polanski. While he was in France working on the movie, Polanski did some skiing and drinking. That made the judge mad and word came to Polanski's lawyers that the judge might revise his original sentence - which at that time was rehab. Polanski never returned to the states. He didn't flee as he had the permission of the judge. I do not know if the judge told Polanski he could not ski or drink, but the fear of serious jail time and a disregard for the conditions of the original plea bargain trumped and Polanski stayed in France.

What would the judge charge him with? Skiing while drinking? Absconding with self? Refusal to come home? Contempt of court? All are valid, evidently, but the one thing they will not charge him with is rape. He has admitted his guilt on that charge.

It makes you wonder how 'wanted' he was if it took U.S. authorities 30 years to catch him. While Polanski has only traveled in 'neutral' countries, it wouldn't take the CIA or the Mossad or the SIS 48 hours to lure him into a place where they could nail him if they wanted. No wonder the 'victim' is screaming bloody murder at the court. She's thinking... ugh, they're going to show my copper-colored panties soaked in semen that I took off myself. They'll be all crusty and brittle after thirty years. She's one unhappy Valley Girl these days thinking, 'Dang, why didn't I run?'
`