We are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for.
Every government program involving money should have a built in auditing requirement. It should also be completely and totally transparent not able to be controlled or classified. A good example of this would be a complete audit done by a national accounting firm where the results are made public in complete detail and not simply handed over to the organization. Complete, to the penny, with names, dates and amounts, published in a format that an 8th grader could understand.
It amazes me that pubic officials and bureaucrats can spend tens of thousands of dollars on airfares, accommodations, entertainment and meals and we only find out years later and then only because a billion was stolen and the investigation turned up a thousand little frauds. Every penny should be accounted for in a timely manner and made public. Every voter/citizen should have this information in print and/or online within days to weeks of the spending. Every government credit card should have it's monthly account published with no redactions especially the name of the person using it.
I can only add that I believe the reason there is so little transparency in government spend is exactly to make it easier to defraud the system. Politicians and bureaucrats get direct and indirect paybacks in every case where there is fraud and it is built into the system too hide it.
This is a great list of giving credit where credit is due. I disagree with Andrew Sullivan a lot, but he gives Trump credit where it is due, and we should give the same to Sullivan.
Nellie Bowles has the best take on Susie Wiles yet. CWCID.
If Roger Pielke says its a bad climate idea, I will defer to him, even though it initially looked good to me. CWCID.
These are discussions that can be had with reasonable people, and those have been in short supply.
#2
Assistant Village Idiot
on
2025-12-19 15:29
(Reply)
Pielke says very little actual climate science is done at the institution so little change could make it compliant with what Trump supports. I think NASA should get totally out of the climate science business and stick to its space flight business. Maybe the new NASA administrator will do that. Climate science has become political science and it tarnishes every institution that partakes in its political follies.
Tracked: Dec 21, 08:54
Tracked: Dec 21, 10:16