Maggie's Farm

The mother of Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick said her son was not beaten with a fire extinguisher by a mob on Jan. 6, saying he likely suffered a stroke instead—refuting reports from the New York Times and other outlets claiming otherwise.

“He wasn’t hit on the head, no. We think he had a stroke, but we don’t know anything for sure,” Gladys Sicknick told the Daily Mail in an exclusive interview on Feb. 22. “We’d love to know what happened.”

The NY Times, CNN, and NBC updated their reports weeks after the Jan. 6 breach to assert that Sicknick was not killed by a fire extinguisher. Originally, the NY Times reported, based on anonymous sources, that Sicknick was beaten to death.

Uh.oh. How awkward for the narrative. That said, why the uncertainty? Does this mean that the family was not provided with the autopsy results? It's been 6+ weeks. What gives?
In the meantime, maybe Mrs Sicknick could contact Dan Crenshaw, he was still peddling that Trump supporters beat Ofcr. Sicknick, killing him, at the behest of Donald Trump, on his podcast last week.

Do you know, if the poison pills are still incorporated into the Dem pay outs? I hope we all know that it's mislabeled a "stimulus".
The Dems are eager to stiff responsible America for the out of control debt rolled up by several very nearly bankrupt Blue states. This debt is the product of malfeasance, corruption, and the constant grift by the insiders. I believe this was one of many factors that motivated their rage toward Trump and the desperation to oust him.
I don't remember if I posted our family experience on Maggies. My Dad died 25 years ago and retired 45 years ago. Last year my sister received a letter from the Illinois Department of Employment Security, addressed to him, declining his application for unemployment benefits. A few days later a debit card was received. My sister was able to determine that in just the previous 3 days, $17,500 had been passed through the account. How does this work, we assume it is a variant of the ghost payroll con. The bogus accounts provide cover for the monies that were rerouted, so yes, it's an inside job.

"NY Times Notices That All These Companies Proclaiming They’re Doing Something On ‘Climate Change’ Mostly Aren’t"

It's a marketing gimmick.
Though, to be fair, I'm sure many companies seek cost effective ways and do what they can to contain their energy costs because that's what they do. The key here is cost effective. There were would be a stampede to incorporate more efficient or alternate energy technology if and when it emerges. This goes over the head of Progs.