We are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for.
Describing an event is not equivalent to endorsement. By your (il)logic, William L. Shirer must be condemned for writing "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich." Your comment, however, does illumine your bigotry and ignorance, I suspect.
Rebekkah, constrained by the age gap with her husband, will use subterfuge to finagle a blessing for Jacob, with his complicity - and he will have to flee to his swindler uncle Laban.
Esau, eager for the blessing, will hide from his father that he discarded Abraham's birthright for a pot of lentils - he will only let that slip in his anger.
Laban's deception will cause a rivalry between Jacob's own children that recalls his own rift with his brother. They will deceive him when they sell Joseph just like he deceived his own father.
Rebekkah will die alone, estranged from both her sons...
This story will only end when Judah, Joseph, and Reuben bring about healing and repentance through their own selfless actions.
There are seveal innaccuracies in the translation, but the most glaring is verse 27: Jacob is not a "quiet" man - but a "guileless, honest" man. He seeks the Abrahamic ideal of civilized human life - symbolized in this chapter, as in the previous chapter, by the tent... unlike the animalistic eat-drink-and-be-merry "man of the field" Esau, who adopts Canaanite wives and ways.