Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Saturday, September 1. 2012Saturday morning linksThink you have it tough? Todd Love Harvard Engulfed in Major Cheating Scandal Steyn: Dog-Whistling Past the Graveyard - Are there any words left that aren’t racist? Behold the Self-Hating White Person Expand Health Care, Not Healthcare Bureaucracy Graham: Nothing scares Obama like truth Economist: The Question for Mr. Obama More golf The filter: How the media will measure Mitt Romney The Media Filter Died Last Night:
Personal kindness and compassion do not count. Unstable MSNBC Host in Angry Restaurant Confrontation Does ObamaCare cover lobotomies? Confirmed: Line-up of speakers at Democratic convention is simply terrible ‘Seniors Suffer under Obama. Where’s the Outcry?’ Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
REsponse to Clint's talk:
The chair was a fine VP: he spoke little, advised the Presidential nominee rather than blurt out to the crowd and stood firmly by his side. A model for Paul Ryan and Biden. I'm voting for Clint and Chair. Daniel Greenfield: Why the World Hates Obama
Bret Stephens: In June, the Pew Research Center released one of its periodic surveys of global opinion. It found that since 2009, favorable attitudes toward the U.S. had slipped nearly everywhere in the world except Russia and, go figure, Japan. Oh gee whiz. Sure, favorability of the U.S. has slipped somewhat from the heady days of 2009, but is still higher in most countries after four years of Obama than when Bush was in office. http://www.pewglobal.org/files/2012/06/USIMAGE0045.png Daniel Greenfield: Obama’s hostility to American power may make the Swedish Nobel committee love him, but it only earns him contempt from enemies and allies. That's simply false based on the author's own citation. It appears Zach actually thinks 'favorability' is based on the truth, rather than what the MSM feeds the world. If you're told every day that Bush is bad, then that's what you're going to mark down on the latest 'favorability' questionnaire. It's surprising Zach doesn't have the mental acuity to figure this out.
Dr. Mercury: It appears Zach{riel} actually thinks 'favorability' is based on the truth, rather than what the MSM feeds the world.
We used the same source that Daniel Greenfield and Bret Stephens used to reach their conclusion. The difference is that they misrepresented the data. We referred directly to it, and provided the relevant table. Armstrong probably used peanut m&m's. I find they work on uphills. I don't know if they test for them.
While you're giving Matthews the lobotomy, give Zach a robotomy
Oh, boo hoo for poor Mike Anderson. Lance promised me a bike shop whaaaaaa. He has been repeating the same sob story for the last ten years. Everyone is out to get Lance. Maybe he used some drug in the first year after his cancer battle. What if that was it? He was the most tested athlete on the planet, and never tested positive. The Fed’s decide that there is not enough evidence to prosecute him, but along comes the USADA—what a witch hunt. He then went on to kick everyone’s ass for the next seven years (using superior team tactics, something that had not really been done before at the Tour). If he cheated, he was the best amongst all the cheaters. Now a few cheaters are caught and they want to bring everyone down with them. To hell with that sport, I for one am sick of the whole sordid affair.
Someone can check me on this, but I think the USADA investigator in Lance Armstrong's case is the same person who investigated Roger Clemens' alleged use of drugs. As we all know, the USADA never laid a bat on the Rocket's fastball. As usual, when they couldn't indict him on the "crime", they went after him on obstruction of justice charges for lying to Congress. And even that weak case fell through. The reason I mention this is not to claim both these professional athletes are innocent of drug use--I don't know that but neither am I convinced in a legal sense that they are guilty as alleged--but that the common thread here may be one of those crusading anti-drug zealots who uses his enormous unchecked power to ruin people's lives by leveling accusations against them in public. My first awareness of how this plays out came in the case of Michael Milken, the so-called junk bond king, who was relentlessly prosecuted for insider trading but was never convicted. Milken eventually took a plea bargain and briefly went to jail only after the prosecution threatened to go after his brother, who was dying of cancer at the time. Sometimes the back story is The Story, i.e., perhaps someone needs to investigate the investigator.
repo accounting worth 20 years in the slammer to Enron execs, but not even a wrist slap to Lehman Bros execs who did the same thing only worse.
Eliot Spitzer, made his fame by taking on the elderly Gambinos --while under the protection of the Gambino young turks, who put him up to it so they could move up.
|
Tracked: Sep 02, 02:30